DarksydePhil's 'racist jokes' defense amplified by r/LivestreamFail (2019)
September 2019
A 2019 clip of streamer DarksydePhil arguing that 'general' racial jokes are acceptable reached a wide audience after being reposted to r/LivestreamFail, the subreddit that has served as a central hub for documenting streamer controversies.
What happened
DarksydePhil, the online handle of streamer Phil Burnell, is a long-running and frequently controversial figure in livestreaming. In September 2019 he became the subject of fresh criticism after a clip circulated in which he defended the use of racial humor. As reported by the Daily Dot and Dexerto, Burnell argued that 'racist jokes are silly, if you do them in a general fashion,' drawing a distinction between what he called general racial jokes and direct personal insults, and suggesting that critics lacked 'thick skin.'
The central mechanism that turned a livestream moment into a documented controversy was Reddit. Both the Daily Dot and Dexerto reported that the clip reached a far wider audience specifically because it was reposted to r/LivestreamFail, the subreddit that functions as the de facto clearinghouse for noteworthy and embarrassing streaming moments. On that subreddit, redditors amplified, archived and criticized the clip, with the Daily Dot quoting a commenter who called it 'hypocrisy at its finest.'
r/LivestreamFail's role here is illustrative of a broader dynamic in creator culture. The subreddit aggregates clips from across Twitch, YouTube and other platforms, and its voting and commenting turn isolated moments into persistent, searchable records that drive press coverage. For a streamer like Burnell, whose conduct had drawn scrutiny before, the subreddit acted as both distribution channel and accountability venue, ensuring that a remark made in the flow of a live broadcast did not simply disappear.
The pattern recurred. Dexerto reported in 2021 that further alleged misconduct involving Burnell was again surfaced and discussed through r/LivestreamFail, reinforcing the subreddit's recurring function as the place where streamer controversies are documented and debated. As with the 2019 clip, the relevant conduct is reported and attributed to the cited outlets, and reflects the criticism leveled at the streamer rather than any independent finding.
The episode is a clear example of a creator controversy that was centered on Reddit not because the conduct occurred there, but because Reddit was the venue that gave it reach, permanence and a critical audience. It underscores how a single subreddit can function as a powerful node in the accountability ecosystem around online creators — capable of elevating a fleeting livestream moment into a story covered by gaming and entertainment press.