In re Subpoena to Reddit — Frontier piracy unmasking appeal mooted (2024–2025)
2024–2025
A third film-studio unmasking attempt, tied to a copyright suit against the ISP Frontier, was rejected by the district court in 2024 and appealed to the Ninth Circuit; the appeal was ultimately dismissed as moot after the underlying case settled, leaving no appellate ruling.
What happened
The most procedurally advanced of the Reddit film-studio unmasking fights arose from a copyright suit against the internet service provider Frontier Communications. Voltage Holdings and Screen Media Ventures sought to subpoena Reddit for the identities and IP logs of users who had posted comments about piracy, again to use as evidence against the ISP rather than to sue the Redditors directly.
On 9 February 2024, Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson of the Northern District of California rejected the subpoena. He reasoned that the producers could obtain the IP-address evidence directly from Frontier, and that the Reddit posts themselves could serve as evidence without unmasking their authors — so there was no adequate justification for compelling Reddit to identify the users. The decision continued the unbroken pattern of district-court refusals seen in the RCN and Grande matters.
Unlike the earlier cases, this one was appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, where it was tracked as 'In re Subpoena to Reddit.' The Electronic Frontier Foundation filed an amicus brief in December 2024 supporting Reddit's position, arguing that there is no copyright exception to the First Amendment's protection for anonymous speech, and briefing continued into early 2025. The appeal raised the prospect of an appellate ruling that would either entrench or test the district-court precedents.
That ruling never came. After the underlying Frontier copyright litigation settled, the producers' appeal was dismissed as moot at their request, so the Ninth Circuit issued no decision on the merits of the Reddit unmasking question. The district court's reasoning stood, but no binding appellate authority emerged from the case.
The outcome is a reminder that high-profile unmasking fights can fizzle on procedural grounds without producing the precedent observers expect. For Reddit and digital-rights advocates, the result was still favorable in practice — every attempt to unmask its users in the film-studio series failed — but the absence of a Ninth Circuit opinion left the broader legal question about copyright-driven subpoenas formally unresolved at the appellate level. It is worth distinguishing this case from the separate August 2025 Ninth Circuit DMCA ruling involving the ISP Cox, which did not involve Reddit.