Reddit Bans r/CoonTown and Other Racist Subreddits Under Steve Huffman's New Content Policy
August 2015
On August 5, 2015, returning CEO Steve Huffman (u/spez) rolled out an updated content policy and banned r/CoonTown along with a cluster of openly racist subreddits, while introducing a new 'quarantine' tier for offensive-but-permitted communities.
What happened
On August 5, 2015, Reddit co-founder and newly reinstated CEO Steve Huffman, posting as u/spez, announced an updated content policy in r/announcements and simultaneously banned a set of notoriously racist communities, including r/CoonTown and its satellites (r/WatchNiggersDie, r/bestofcoontown, r/koontown, r/CoonTownMods, r/CoonTownMeta) along with r/RapingWomen. The action came about a month after Huffman returned following the resignation of interim CEO Ellen Pao.
The new policy formalized a distinction between two enforcement tiers. Communities deemed extremely offensive would be 'quarantined' — hidden from general browsing and viewable only by opt-in users. A smaller set deemed to exist solely to annoy other redditors and make Reddit worse would be banned outright. r/CoonTown, which had survived an earlier June 2015 round of bans aimed at harassment, fell into the latter category.
The framing drew criticism. Rather than condemning the subreddits primarily for racist content, Huffman emphasized operational burden, saying the small number of such communities consumed a disproportionate share of moderation resources. He also stated Reddit was never intended to be a 'bastion of free speech.' Critics argued the rationale was muddled and set an ambiguous standard, while some users complained the policy was simultaneously too aggressive (a slippery slope to broad censorship) and too timid (leaving many borderline communities merely quarantined). As with the June bans, users of removed communities migrated toward Voat and stood up evasion clones.
The efficacy of the 2015 bans became one of the most-studied questions in content-moderation research. The 2017 CSCW paper "You Can't Stay Here" concluded the bans worked as intended: many affected accounts abandoned Reddit, those who stayed reduced their hate-speech term usage by more than 80% relative to controls, and 'invaded' destination subreddits did not become measurably more hateful — countering the common assumption that deplatforming simply spreads toxicity elsewhere on the same site.
Impact
The August 2015 bans marked one of Reddit's earliest large-scale enforcement actions against hate communities and established the quarantine-versus-ban framework the platform relied on for years. The widely cited 2017 academic study ('You Can't Stay Here', Chandrasekharan et al., CSCW) analyzed over 100 million posts and found the bans were effective: many affected accounts left Reddit, those who stayed reduced hate-speech usage by at least 80%, and destination subreddits did not see meaningful increases. The episode also fed the long-running debate over Reddit's identity and the limits of its free-speech posture.
Sources
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
What this led to
The documented consequences of this issue — the convictions, lawsuits, regulatory actions, policy changes, and bans it triggered.
Related context
People, quotes, research, and reference entries linked to this issue.